| CBI: 
                  Mismatch between duties and powers  By Aditi Roy Ghatak Given that 
                  corruption in India is not a crime but getting caught is, the 
                  list of bureaucrats facing corruption charges on the Central 
                  Vigilance Commissioner's website is significant in more ways 
                  than one. Notwithstanding the scepticism with which it has 
                  been greeted in some influential quarters and the 
                  inconsequential impact it has had on the quality of corruption 
                  in public life, the fact is that by naming members of his 
                  fraternity who are under suspicion, the CVC may have induced a 
                  sense of shame in them. If, however, those who have so 
                  cynically abused the authority bestowed on them are beyond 
                  being shamed, they are certainly not beyond feeling 
                  threatened. The key element in this new drama of a website to 
                  tell all is action. Hopefully, the man who could take the 
                  first bold step will succeed in taking the next. 
 Talking about words and action, it would be worthwhile 
                  to consider the Central Bureau of Investigation - the mother 
                  of all investigators.
 
 It was as early as 1940s when it 
                  was realised by those in charge of law and order that there 
                  was scope for such a special body and the Delhi Special Police 
                  Establishment was moved to creating what is now the CBI. Words 
                  and a bit of action. Yet, some six decades later and with all 
                  the pushing and cajoling by interested quarters, the CBI Act 
                  has not been passed. The organisation operates through the 
                  Indian criminal jungle, thanks to the converted Delhi Special 
                  Police Establishment Ordinance, 1943 that became an Act in 
                  1947, wherefore someone put a full stop to the natural 
                  evolution of the Act.
 
 Where does this leave India's 
                  prince among investigators? Quite simply, powerless to act in 
                  the states of India - though it must act across the length and 
                  breadth of the country - unless there is a clearance from the 
                  states. One could, of course, point out that things were much 
                  worse a year ago when the CBI could not lift a little finger 
                  of inquiry on its own and had to seek written clearance from 
                  the departmental secretary before investigating an officer. 
                  Shantonu Sen, former Special IG, CBI recalls: "This 
                  striking example of the powers that be putting a spoke in the 
                  wheel in the CBI's zeal to investigate certain officials 
                  featured the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi and former 
                  Union finance minister, P. Chidambaram who in 1983 inserted 
                  the proviso in the Single Directive prohibiting the CBI from 
                  proceeding with even a secret inquiry without a written 
                  clearance from the departmental secretary for officers in the 
                  rank of joint secretary and above".
 
 Not surprisingly, 
                  while all this permission seeking went on, the officer to be 
                  investigated would cover his tracks. This shocking state of 
                  affairs meant that the government had virtually installed a 
                  hierarchy in the investigation regime. Investigate the 
                  flunkies not the boss. Matters stand corrected today as far as 
                  the Central Government is concerned but when it comes to the 
                  states - arguably the hot seat of corruption, the CBI 
                  continues to be stumped without the CBI Act that like the FBI 
                  Act of the United States would declare certain offences as 
                  federal.
 
 Witness the travails of Upen Biswas 
                  investigating the fodder scam case in Bihar with at best piece 
                  meal permissions to proceed with investigations and having to 
                  secure legal sanctions for every move. The ideal CBI Act would 
                  have given Biswas the right to investigate - what must be 
                  proven offences - without having, infructuously, to seek 
                  permission of the offenders themselves, as seems to have been 
                  the case. That Biswas derived his authority under special 
                  judicial dispensation pursuant to a public interest litigation 
                  on the matter was an entirely fortuitous 
                  development.
 
 The ideal CBI Act would have enabled the 
                  CBI to investigate Jayalalitha when she was chief minister. 
                  Instead, there was no CBI investigation and today the 
                  investigators at the Tamil Nadu state anti-corruption wing is 
                  doing what had to be done years after the allegations were 
                  levelled and amidst charges that the investigations under an 
                  opposition party are being politically guided.
 
 A 
                  special investigation agency - to conduct the war on 
                  corruption in a country that ranks among the most corrupt in 
                  the world - that will be subservient only to the law and not 
                  to political masters is a consummation devoutly to be wished. 
                  Can the CVC ensure action on this score?
 ARG 
                  Syndication
 |